Soft-portrait of a woman with curly hair, golden background, pearls — AI art by @CaylaCatz

@CaylaCatz · 2/7/2026

@justrob did a cool prompt that gave a lovely golden light to his images in his post at https://budgetpixel.com/p/8108 I thought I would try it here but remove the artists' names to see what would happen. Everything done in SeeDream 4 Picture 1. no subject, justrob's prompt sans artists Picture 2. no subject, justrob's prompt sans artists Picture 3. added "dark haired woman. rose." justrob's prompt sans artists Removing the "pearl" reference too Picture 4. added "dark haired woman. white rose." justrob's prompt sans artists and no "pearl" I wanted to try more color with this one to see what it did with a scene Picture 5. added "dark cat with olive eyes. red wildflowers. white wildflowers. periwinkle wildflowers. sunset.", justrob's prompt sans artists This one is minus the artists and no pearl Picture 6. added "dark cat with olive eyes. red wildflowers. white wildflowers. periwinkle wildflowers. sunset.", justrob's prompt sans artists, no "pearl" Prompt from justrob minus the artist names: Romantic sensibility, where warm chiaroscuro layering creates molten amber-to-umber tonal depth through fine granulated crosshatching that gives every surface tactile warmth, luminous glazing technique produces iridescent light-catching translucency via delicate layered washes of gold and pearl, and Romantic sensibility infuses an atmosphere of mythic reverence where light itself breathes. The fusion manifests as rich earth-and-honey palette dominance, soft-focus atmospheric hazing at edges, and intricate surface grain texture, transforming any subject through golden diffused luminosity, warm shadow depth, and shimmering translucent highlights.

Soft-portrait of a woman with curly hair, golden background, pearls, and a glowing bubble. — A luminous oil painting featuring a delicate female portrait bathed in warm golden hues. The impressionistic brushwork and soft light create a romantic mood, with pearls at her neckline and a iridescent bubble adding a magical focal point.

Close-up portrait of a young woman with golden glitter on her face and warm, soft lighting. — A close-up portrait featuring a woman with a radiant golden glitter makeup look, soft peach lips, and warm lighting. The textured sparkle creates an ethereal mood, emphasizing glow and natural beauty in a studio-style beauty shot.

Woman with golden body paint and flowing hair near ornate gold roses and pearls, warm glow. — A ethereal, editorial portrait featuring a woman with shimmering gold body paint and long, flowing hair, illuminated by warm golden light. Surrounded by opulent gold roses and pearl accents, the scene exudes fantasy glamour and luxurious mood, with rich amber tones and soft, magical ambiance—perfect for art, fashion, and beauty keywords.

Portrait of a young woman with dark hair holding a white rose against a golden, textured background. — A soft, romantic oil painting portrait of a young woman with flowing dark hair, gazing down at a white rose. The warm golden background and delicate iridescent highlights create a luminous, impressionistic mood, with refined brushwork and a serene, contemplative expression.

Black cat among colorful flowers at sunset with gold accents and shells. — A stylized scene featuring a black cat seated among vibrant red, white, and blue flowers against a glowing sunset with gold textures. The composition blends whimsical, decorative art elements and pet portrait vibes, creating a warm, magical mood ideal for cat lovers and floral-themed visuals.

Black cat with green eyes among colorful flowers at sunset with gold accents. — An artistic portrait of a black cat sitting amidst a vibrant garden at sunset, featuring red poppies, blue blooms, and white flowers. The scene is rendered in a painterly, impressionistic style with shimmering gold accents, creating a serene, magical mood.

9 likes · 8 comments

Comments

justrob

whats your conclusion about artists? My personal opinion is that it matters little unless the artist is part of the training set.

justrob

ive been thinking about leaving the names out of the styles. Though I think it effects different models differently.

CaylaCatz

One thing I should mention & it is about me & my art done about 30 yrs ago. 30 yrs ago, on Google searches, there was a cached button so if you clicked the url & the page was no longer there, you could click cached & see the historical document cuz Google collected them. So did other sites. I think the databases for training AIs goes back that far. I think that cuz 30 years ago for a few yrs I was in a Bay area artist group. I was into photography, had a gallery showing & was in a few group shows. I had an art website. I was never known, not even a little. My photo site went down 20 yrs ago cuz yahoo sold their web hosting & I lost my domain. Searching now for my artist name does not pull up those photos on google. Oct 2025, I ran a test. Without describing my style, I prompted NC in the style of my art name & gave a simple subject. No other styling. The result was spookily like what I used to do. Doubt anyone remembers that name so copying is a nonissue.But I'm there from 20-30yrs ago

CaylaCatz

Probably. Mostly I think it will depend on the total length of the prompt. Cheaper models don't do a long prompt but pick and choose bits. Nano & SeeDream tend to try to incorporate it all. But you might find a core that is across models and parts that depend on the model or the rest of the prompt. Even things as strong as Impressionism or Art Nouveau can play differently from model to model & prompt length. I like randomness sometimes so then I use P-image. Sometimes I want what I want and I go up the ladder, usually SeeDream or Nano. I'd use Flux more but it tends to be flat contrast-wise in BP. I have to export to fix it. I've noticed you have a very good eye and can identify an artists' style components. It's why I liked your layered prompt so much. It's rare. A lot of people haven't learned to do that. Many people just say the name without explicitly being able to state the style components. It's like tasting wine, an educated palate sorta thing.

CaylaCatz

I think identifying what you like about an artist is more important than using the artist's name. Both living & dead artists r part of training sets. Most of us don't know who is included. There are lists like this https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14xTqtuV3BuKDNhLotB_d1aFlBGnDJOY0BRXJ8-86GpA/edit?gid=0#gid=0 where people experimented to see which artists r recognized. Those lists prob only scratch the surface. Some living artists r pushing for laws or a way to be removed from training sets. That may mean scraping models & retraining from scratch if laws or new requirements demand AI models are redone without live artists. Knowing what elements you liked in their work means you can still prompt for style. We used to need artists names to correct for AI mutant mistakes. Now artist names r shortcuts to style & subject. Using artists names work in prompts cuz they are in the db. Prompters wouldn't use artist names if they didn't work. If you define the style, the name is unneeded.

CaylaCatz

Also I should have said and don't think I emphasized it enough. I like your prompt very much. It has some cool layers to it and that has very much to do with how you structured it. That's why it works so great and still gives images a unique touch even when you take out parts. It's like a building with very good bones. You can move some walls because the building is solid.

CaylaCatz

thank you. justrob wrote a really good prompt.