Open BudgetPixel

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst vs GPT Image 2.6 Flare

5 identical prompts, default settings, blind community votes. Head-to-head: 70% preferred GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst, 30% preferred GPT Image 2.6 Flare, 0 ties, 10 votes.

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst and GPT Image 2.6 Flare have met in 10 blind head-to-head votes on 5 identical prompts in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena. GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst was preferred in 70% of them and GPT Image 2.6 Flare in 30%, with 0 ties — a narrow lead that more votes could still overturn. GPT Image 2.6 Flare was faster, at 9.8s median per image against 45.7s for GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst.

From the BudgetPixel blog

FAQ

Is GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst better than GPT Image 2.6 Flare?
In the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst beats GPT Image 2.6 Flare in 70% of 10 blind head-to-head votes on identical prompts (GPT Image 2.6 Flare 30%, ties 0%). The lead is narrow, so it could still change as votes come in. The per-prompt results on this page show where each model wins.
Which is faster, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst or GPT Image 2.6 Flare?
GPT Image 2.6 Flare is faster: 9.8s median per 1:1 image against 45.7s for GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst, measured on the same 5 prompts at default settings in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena.
Which is cheaper, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst or GPT Image 2.6 Flare?
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst is cheaper on BudgetPixel: 40 credits ($0.040) per 1:1 image against 120 credits ($0.12) for GPT Image 2.6 Flare, at default settings.
How is this comparison made?
Both models render the identical prompt at default settings; voters see the two images blind and pick the better one. Model names are revealed only after the vote.