Open BudgetPixel

GPT Image 2.5 Flare vs GPT Image 2.6 Flare

5 identical prompts, default settings, blind community votes. Head-to-head: 50% preferred GPT Image 2.5 Flare, 40% preferred GPT Image 2.6 Flare, 1 ties, 10 votes.

GPT Image 2.5 Flare and GPT Image 2.6 Flare have met in 10 blind head-to-head votes on 5 identical prompts in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena. The votes are too close to call so far: GPT Image 2.5 Flare 50%, GPT Image 2.6 Flare 40%, 1 ties. GPT Image 2.6 Flare was faster, at 9.8s median per image against 28.2s for GPT Image 2.5 Flare.

From the BudgetPixel blog

FAQ

Is GPT Image 2.5 Flare better than GPT Image 2.6 Flare?
Too close to call so far: in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena, GPT Image 2.5 Flare wins 50% and GPT Image 2.6 Flare 40% of 10 blind head-to-head votes (ties 10%), within what chance alone would produce. The per-prompt results on this page show where each model wins.
Which is faster, GPT Image 2.5 Flare or GPT Image 2.6 Flare?
GPT Image 2.6 Flare is faster: 9.8s median per 1:1 image against 28.2s for GPT Image 2.5 Flare, measured on the same 5 prompts at default settings in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena.
Which is cheaper, GPT Image 2.5 Flare or GPT Image 2.6 Flare?
GPT Image 2.5 Flare is cheaper on BudgetPixel: 40 credits ($0.040) per 1:1 image against 120 credits ($0.12) for GPT Image 2.6 Flare, at default settings.
How is this comparison made?
Both models render the identical prompt at default settings; voters see the two images blind and pick the better one. Model names are revealed only after the vote.