Open BudgetPixel

GPT Image 2.6 Sunburst vs Seedream 5.5

14 identical prompts, default settings, blind community votes. Head-to-head: 47% preferred GPT Image 2.6 Sunburst, 47% preferred Seedream 5.5, 1 ties, 15 votes.

GPT Image 2.6 Sunburst and Seedream 5.5 have met in 15 blind head-to-head votes on 14 identical prompts in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena. The votes are too close to call so far: GPT Image 2.6 Sunburst 47%, Seedream 5.5 47%, 1 ties. Seedream 5.5 was faster, at 29.9s median per image against 30.4s for GPT Image 2.6 Sunburst.

From the BudgetPixel blog

FAQ

Is GPT Image 2.6 Sunburst better than Seedream 5.5?
Too close to call so far: in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena, GPT Image 2.6 Sunburst wins 47% and Seedream 5.5 47% of 15 blind head-to-head votes (ties 7%), within what chance alone would produce. The per-prompt results on this page show where each model wins.
Which is faster, GPT Image 2.6 Sunburst or Seedream 5.5?
Seedream 5.5 is faster: 29.9s median per 1:1 image against 30.4s for GPT Image 2.6 Sunburst, measured on the same 14 prompts at default settings in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena.
Which is cheaper, GPT Image 2.6 Sunburst or Seedream 5.5?
Seedream 5.5 is cheaper on BudgetPixel: 46 credits ($0.046) per 1:1 image against 120 credits ($0.12) for GPT Image 2.6 Sunburst, at default settings.
How is this comparison made?
Both models render the identical prompt at default settings; voters see the two images blind and pick the better one. Model names are revealed only after the vote.