Open BudgetPixel

FLUX 3 Image vs Nano Banana 2 Lite

4 identical prompts, default settings, blind community votes. Head-to-head: 10% preferred FLUX 3 Image, 60% preferred Nano Banana 2 Lite, 3 ties, 10 votes.

FLUX 3 Image and Nano Banana 2 Lite have met in 10 blind head-to-head votes on 4 identical prompts in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena. Nano Banana 2 Lite was preferred in 60% of them and FLUX 3 Image in 10%, with 3 ties — a narrow lead that more votes could still overturn. Nano Banana 2 Lite was faster, at 18.3s median per image against 24.9s for FLUX 3 Image.

FAQ

Is FLUX 3 Image better than Nano Banana 2 Lite?
In the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena, Nano Banana 2 Lite beats FLUX 3 Image in 60% of 10 blind head-to-head votes on identical prompts (FLUX 3 Image 10%, ties 30%). The lead is narrow, so it could still change as votes come in. The per-prompt results on this page show where each model wins.
Which is faster, FLUX 3 Image or Nano Banana 2 Lite?
Nano Banana 2 Lite is faster: 18.3s median per 1:1 image against 24.9s for FLUX 3 Image, measured on the same 4 prompts at default settings in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena.
Which is cheaper, FLUX 3 Image or Nano Banana 2 Lite?
Nano Banana 2 Lite is cheaper on BudgetPixel: 40 credits ($0.040) per 1:1 image against 65 credits ($0.065) for FLUX 3 Image, at default settings.
How is this comparison made?
Both models render the identical prompt at default settings; voters see the two images blind and pick the better one. Model names are revealed only after the vote.