Open BudgetPixel

Qwen Image 3.0 Pro vs Recraft v4

225 identical prompts, default settings, blind community votes. Head-to-head: 42% preferred Qwen Image 3.0 Pro, 50% preferred Recraft v4, 12 ties, 153 votes.

Qwen Image 3.0 Pro and Recraft v4 have met in 153 blind head-to-head votes on 225 identical prompts in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena. The votes are too close to call so far: Qwen Image 3.0 Pro 42%, Recraft v4 50%, 12 ties. Qwen Image 3.0 Pro was faster, at 10.6s median per image against 12.5s for Recraft v4.

FAQ

Is Qwen Image 3.0 Pro better than Recraft v4?
Too close to call so far: in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena, Qwen Image 3.0 Pro wins 42% and Recraft v4 50% of 153 blind head-to-head votes (ties 8%), within what chance alone would produce. The per-prompt results on this page show where each model wins.
Which is faster, Qwen Image 3.0 Pro or Recraft v4?
Qwen Image 3.0 Pro is faster: 10.6s median per 1:1 image against 12.5s for Recraft v4, measured on the same 225 prompts at default settings in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena.
Which is cheaper, Qwen Image 3.0 Pro or Recraft v4?
Qwen Image 3.0 Pro and Recraft v4 cost the same on BudgetPixel: 45 credits ($0.045) per 1:1 image at default settings.
How is this comparison made?
Both models render the identical prompt at default settings; voters see the two images blind and pick the better one. Model names are revealed only after the vote.