Open BudgetPixel

Ideogram v4 vs Nano Banana 2.1

13 identical prompts, default settings, blind community votes. Head-to-head: 30% preferred Ideogram v4, 60% preferred Nano Banana 2.1, 1 ties, 10 votes.

Ideogram v4 and Nano Banana 2.1 have met in 10 blind head-to-head votes on 13 identical prompts in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena. Nano Banana 2.1 was preferred in 60% of them and Ideogram v4 in 30%, with 1 ties — a narrow lead that more votes could still overturn. Nano Banana 2.1 was faster, at 10.9s median per image against 14.8s for Ideogram v4.

FAQ

Is Ideogram v4 better than Nano Banana 2.1?
In the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena, Nano Banana 2.1 beats Ideogram v4 in 60% of 10 blind head-to-head votes on identical prompts (Ideogram v4 30%, ties 10%). The lead is narrow, so it could still change as votes come in. The per-prompt results on this page show where each model wins.
Which is faster, Ideogram v4 or Nano Banana 2.1?
Nano Banana 2.1 is faster: 10.9s median per 1:1 image against 14.8s for Ideogram v4, measured on the same 13 prompts at default settings in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena.
Which is cheaper, Ideogram v4 or Nano Banana 2.1?
Ideogram v4 is cheaper on BudgetPixel: 40 credits ($0.040) per 1:1 image against 45 credits ($0.045) for Nano Banana 2.1, at default settings.
How is this comparison made?
Both models render the identical prompt at default settings; voters see the two images blind and pick the better one. Model names are revealed only after the vote.