Open BudgetPixel

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst vs Nano Banana 2.1

12 identical prompts, default settings, blind community votes. Head-to-head: 44% preferred GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst, 44% preferred Nano Banana 2.1, 2 ties, 16 votes.

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst and Nano Banana 2.1 have met in 16 blind head-to-head votes on 12 identical prompts in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena. The votes are too close to call so far: GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst 44%, Nano Banana 2.1 44%, 2 ties. Nano Banana 2.1 was faster, at 10.9s median per image against 53.5s for GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst.

FAQ

Is GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst better than Nano Banana 2.1?
Too close to call so far: in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst wins 44% and Nano Banana 2.1 44% of 16 blind head-to-head votes (ties 13%), within what chance alone would produce. The per-prompt results on this page show where each model wins.
Which is faster, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst or Nano Banana 2.1?
Nano Banana 2.1 is faster: 10.9s median per 1:1 image against 53.5s for GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst, measured on the same 12 prompts at default settings in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena.
Which is cheaper, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst or Nano Banana 2.1?
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst is cheaper on BudgetPixel: 40 credits ($0.040) per 1:1 image against 45 credits ($0.045) for Nano Banana 2.1, at default settings.
How is this comparison made?
Both models render the identical prompt at default settings; voters see the two images blind and pick the better one. Model names are revealed only after the vote.