Open BudgetPixel

GPT Image 2.5 Flare vs Nano Banana 2.1

13 identical prompts, default settings, blind community votes. Head-to-head: 36% preferred GPT Image 2.5 Flare, 45% preferred Nano Banana 2.1, 2 ties, 11 votes.

GPT Image 2.5 Flare and Nano Banana 2.1 have met in 11 blind head-to-head votes on 13 identical prompts in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena. The votes are too close to call so far: GPT Image 2.5 Flare 36%, Nano Banana 2.1 45%, 2 ties. Nano Banana 2.1 was faster, at 10.9s median per image against 35.9s for GPT Image 2.5 Flare.

FAQ

Is GPT Image 2.5 Flare better than Nano Banana 2.1?
Too close to call so far: in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena, GPT Image 2.5 Flare wins 36% and Nano Banana 2.1 45% of 11 blind head-to-head votes (ties 18%), within what chance alone would produce. The per-prompt results on this page show where each model wins.
Which is faster, GPT Image 2.5 Flare or Nano Banana 2.1?
Nano Banana 2.1 is faster: 10.9s median per 1:1 image against 35.9s for GPT Image 2.5 Flare, measured on the same 13 prompts at default settings in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena.
Which is cheaper, GPT Image 2.5 Flare or Nano Banana 2.1?
GPT Image 2.5 Flare is cheaper on BudgetPixel: 40 credits ($0.040) per 1:1 image against 45 credits ($0.045) for Nano Banana 2.1, at default settings.
How is this comparison made?
Both models render the identical prompt at default settings; voters see the two images blind and pick the better one. Model names are revealed only after the vote.