Open BudgetPixel

Midjourney V8.2 vs Qwen Image 3.0 Pro

15 identical prompts, default settings, blind community votes. Head-to-head: 36% preferred Midjourney V8.2, 36% preferred Qwen Image 3.0 Pro, 3 ties, 11 votes.

Midjourney V8.2 and Qwen Image 3.0 Pro have met in 11 blind head-to-head votes on 15 identical prompts in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena. The votes are too close to call so far: Midjourney V8.2 36%, Qwen Image 3.0 Pro 36%, 3 ties. Qwen Image 3.0 Pro was faster, at 10.7s median per image against 99.8s for Midjourney V8.2.

FAQ

Is Midjourney V8.2 better than Qwen Image 3.0 Pro?
Too close to call so far: in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena, Midjourney V8.2 wins 36% and Qwen Image 3.0 Pro 36% of 11 blind head-to-head votes (ties 27%), within what chance alone would produce. The per-prompt results on this page show where each model wins.
Which is faster, Midjourney V8.2 or Qwen Image 3.0 Pro?
Qwen Image 3.0 Pro is faster: 10.7s median per 1:1 image against 99.8s for Midjourney V8.2, measured on the same 15 prompts at default settings in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena.
Which is cheaper, Midjourney V8.2 or Qwen Image 3.0 Pro?
Midjourney V8.2 is cheaper on BudgetPixel: 40 credits ($0.040) per 1:1 image against 45 credits ($0.045) for Qwen Image 3.0 Pro, at default settings.
How is this comparison made?
Both models render the identical prompt at default settings; voters see the two images blind and pick the better one. Model names are revealed only after the vote.