Midjourney V8.2 vs Qwen Image 3.0
15 identical prompts, default settings, blind community votes. Head-to-head: 45% preferred Midjourney V8.2, 55% preferred Qwen Image 3.0, 0 ties, 11 votes.
Midjourney V8.2 and Qwen Image 3.0 have met in 11 blind head-to-head votes on 15 identical prompts in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena. The votes are too close to call so far: Midjourney V8.2 45%, Qwen Image 3.0 55%, 0 ties. Qwen Image 3.0 was faster, at 7.2s median per image against 99.8s for Midjourney V8.2.
- “A cat flying in the sky wearing a super kitty costume.”Illustration & anime
FAQ
- Is Midjourney V8.2 better than Qwen Image 3.0?
- Too close to call so far: in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena, Midjourney V8.2 wins 45% and Qwen Image 3.0 55% of 11 blind head-to-head votes (ties 0%), within what chance alone would produce. The per-prompt results on this page show where each model wins.
- Which is faster, Midjourney V8.2 or Qwen Image 3.0?
- Qwen Image 3.0 is faster: 7.2s median per 1:1 image against 99.8s for Midjourney V8.2, measured on the same 15 prompts at default settings in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena.
- Which is cheaper, Midjourney V8.2 or Qwen Image 3.0?
- Midjourney V8.2 and Qwen Image 3.0 cost the same on BudgetPixel: 40 credits ($0.040) per 1:1 image at default settings.
- How is this comparison made?
- Both models render the identical prompt at default settings; voters see the two images blind and pick the better one. Model names are revealed only after the vote.





























