Open BudgetPixel

Midjourney V8.2 vs Nano Banana 2.1

15 identical prompts, default settings, blind community votes. Head-to-head: 50% preferred Midjourney V8.2, 33% preferred Nano Banana 2.1, 2 ties, 12 votes.

Midjourney V8.2 and Nano Banana 2.1 have met in 12 blind head-to-head votes on 15 identical prompts in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena. The votes are too close to call so far: Midjourney V8.2 50%, Nano Banana 2.1 33%, 2 ties. Nano Banana 2.1 was faster, at 10.3s median per image against 99.8s for Midjourney V8.2.

FAQ

Is Midjourney V8.2 better than Nano Banana 2.1?
Too close to call so far: in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena, Midjourney V8.2 wins 50% and Nano Banana 2.1 33% of 12 blind head-to-head votes (ties 17%), within what chance alone would produce. The per-prompt results on this page show where each model wins.
Which is faster, Midjourney V8.2 or Nano Banana 2.1?
Nano Banana 2.1 is faster: 10.3s median per 1:1 image against 99.8s for Midjourney V8.2, measured on the same 15 prompts at default settings in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena.
Which is cheaper, Midjourney V8.2 or Nano Banana 2.1?
Midjourney V8.2 is cheaper on BudgetPixel: 40 credits ($0.040) per 1:1 image against 45 credits ($0.045) for Nano Banana 2.1, at default settings.
How is this comparison made?
Both models render the identical prompt at default settings; voters see the two images blind and pick the better one. Model names are revealed only after the vote.