FLUX 3 Image vs Qwen Image 3.0 Pro
14 identical prompts, default settings, blind community votes. Head-to-head: 21% preferred FLUX 3 Image, 50% preferred Qwen Image 3.0 Pro, 4 ties, 14 votes.
FLUX 3 Image and Qwen Image 3.0 Pro have met in 14 blind head-to-head votes on 14 identical prompts in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena. Qwen Image 3.0 Pro was preferred in 50% of them and FLUX 3 Image in 21%, with 4 ties — a narrow lead that more votes could still overturn. Qwen Image 3.0 Pro was faster, at 10.9s median per image against 24.3s for FLUX 3 Image.
- “Vampire bat art, volumetric fog, chiaroscuro lighting, subsurface scattering.”Illustration & anime
FAQ
- Is FLUX 3 Image better than Qwen Image 3.0 Pro?
- In the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena, Qwen Image 3.0 Pro beats FLUX 3 Image in 50% of 14 blind head-to-head votes on identical prompts (FLUX 3 Image 21%, ties 29%). The lead is narrow, so it could still change as votes come in. The per-prompt results on this page show where each model wins.
- Which is faster, FLUX 3 Image or Qwen Image 3.0 Pro?
- Qwen Image 3.0 Pro is faster: 10.9s median per 1:1 image against 24.3s for FLUX 3 Image, measured on the same 14 prompts at default settings in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena.
- Which is cheaper, FLUX 3 Image or Qwen Image 3.0 Pro?
- Qwen Image 3.0 Pro is cheaper on BudgetPixel: 45 credits ($0.045) per 1:1 image against 65 credits ($0.065) for FLUX 3 Image, at default settings.
- How is this comparison made?
- Both models render the identical prompt at default settings; voters see the two images blind and pick the better one. Model names are revealed only after the vote.



























