FLUX 3 Image vs Qwen Image 3.0
14 identical prompts, default settings, blind community votes. Head-to-head: 45% preferred FLUX 3 Image, 45% preferred Qwen Image 3.0, 1 ties, 11 votes.
FLUX 3 Image and Qwen Image 3.0 have met in 11 blind head-to-head votes on 14 identical prompts in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena. The votes are too close to call so far: FLUX 3 Image 45%, Qwen Image 3.0 45%, 1 ties. Qwen Image 3.0 was faster, at 7.1s median per image against 24.3s for FLUX 3 Image.
- “A cunning fox with fur like molten gold cautiously steps through a dense, ancient forest. Shafts of light pierce the canopy, illuminating dust motes dancing in the air. Strange, glowing mushrooms cast an otherworldly light on the moss-covered ground. The style is a blend of dark fantasy illustration and hyperrealism, with a focus on dramatic, cinematic lighting.”Concept art & fantasy · 1 votes: 0% / 100%
- “Vampire bat art, volumetric fog, chiaroscuro lighting, subsurface scattering.”Illustration & anime
FAQ
- Is FLUX 3 Image better than Qwen Image 3.0?
- Too close to call so far: in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena, FLUX 3 Image wins 45% and Qwen Image 3.0 45% of 11 blind head-to-head votes (ties 9%), within what chance alone would produce. The per-prompt results on this page show where each model wins.
- Which is faster, FLUX 3 Image or Qwen Image 3.0?
- Qwen Image 3.0 is faster: 7.1s median per 1:1 image against 24.3s for FLUX 3 Image, measured on the same 14 prompts at default settings in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena.
- Which is cheaper, FLUX 3 Image or Qwen Image 3.0?
- Qwen Image 3.0 is cheaper on BudgetPixel: 40 credits ($0.040) per 1:1 image against 65 credits ($0.065) for FLUX 3 Image, at default settings.
- How is this comparison made?
- Both models render the identical prompt at default settings; voters see the two images blind and pick the better one. Model names are revealed only after the vote.



























