Open BudgetPixel

FLUX 3 Image vs Nano Banana 2.1

13 identical prompts, default settings, blind community votes. Head-to-head: 50% preferred FLUX 3 Image, 30% preferred Nano Banana 2.1, 2 ties, 10 votes.

FLUX 3 Image and Nano Banana 2.1 have met in 10 blind head-to-head votes on 13 identical prompts in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena. The votes are too close to call so far: FLUX 3 Image 50%, Nano Banana 2.1 30%, 2 ties. Nano Banana 2.1 was faster, at 10.9s median per image against 27.0s for FLUX 3 Image.

FAQ

Is FLUX 3 Image better than Nano Banana 2.1?
Too close to call so far: in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena, FLUX 3 Image wins 50% and Nano Banana 2.1 30% of 10 blind head-to-head votes (ties 20%), within what chance alone would produce. The per-prompt results on this page show where each model wins.
Which is faster, FLUX 3 Image or Nano Banana 2.1?
Nano Banana 2.1 is faster: 10.9s median per 1:1 image against 27.0s for FLUX 3 Image, measured on the same 13 prompts at default settings in the BudgetPixel AI Image Arena.
Which is cheaper, FLUX 3 Image or Nano Banana 2.1?
Nano Banana 2.1 is cheaper on BudgetPixel: 45 credits ($0.045) per 1:1 image against 65 credits ($0.065) for FLUX 3 Image, at default settings.
How is this comparison made?
Both models render the identical prompt at default settings; voters see the two images blind and pick the better one. Model names are revealed only after the vote.