Mature or Adult? That is the question...

By antares

I like BudgetPixel for many reasons: it has a clean and attractive interface, allows effective use of many models for creating images at a fair cost (I can't say the same for video creation, which is rather expensive, at least imho). However, I'm perplexed about the distinction between Mature and Adult material, which I have not found on any other site I've posted on. Let me be clear: I completely understand the need to put a limit to what can be poste, but until recently the limit seemed to be determined only by the user's level of subscription, now the maximum level allowed seems to be Mature for all users. And, according to what is written in the Safety menu, Mature corresponds to Partial nudity . If I'm not mistaken, this means I can create any kind of NSFW content, but I can't post it if it's classified as Adult , because no one will see it. So, I think it would be important to better specify how Partial nudity should be understood. I think the following image can certainly be taken as an example of partial nudity. The same, I think, if I make her a bit hotter: And what about this one? Or this one? Or this one? As you can see, there are many ways to create Partial nudes . Now I'll stop here, hoping that this post will be rated Mature and not Adult , so that others users can check it out. I think it would be helpful if someone from the BudgetPixel team could clarify, here on the site and not elsewhere, what we can post so we can be sure that other users with Mature safety can see it.

Tags: safety, nude, nsfwimages, adult, mature

Comments (9)

EternaSky

Yea. This direction is pretty much correct. In a much shorter summary. “Full frontal genital reveal” is definitely adult. And also extremist gore and blood and mutilation is definitely adult.

xiaoqiao

Sorry for the late post, but which AI models actually deliver the prompt results with Mature content, like uploading an image with partial nudity then putting in a prompt and generating something, i tried it with the Grok model which not surprisingly just refused because of moderation, i tried the Wan 2.7 model and it generated an image but it put clothes on so there was no more nudity. So basically, which models are fine with keeping the NSFW stuff without moderation or covering them up?

antares

Ok, if you work "image to image" you have to choose one of the models marked as "Unrestricted", that is Qwen, Wan and SeeDream, then in your prompt you must specify what you want: naked, nude, veiled, topless, thong, and so on. You may check out my other tutorials here on BP where I explain in detail how to get quality NSFW images. Can you find them?

strixowl-47

After leaving NC I find BP much more lenient. Over there you have to deal with auto moderation and human moderation. Since humans all have different opinions it's chaos. You never know if the time, credits, $$ are a waste until you upload. And appeals is a real crap shoot. I only use the lenient models.

JustAsh

I have to say as something of a noob that this issue is both confusing and something of a crapshoot. Some engines simply will not render an "adult" image no matter what level your account is set at, others will do so with no problem. Then there are cases I've seen where I could give the AI a photo and a prompt and as long as I didn't mention certain forbidden words it would be perfectly happy to render a video that even include full frontal nudity. And despite BPs rather unique content tier this is hardly a problem that is unique to this platform. I think it all comes back to the issue of what one might define as "obscene" and THAT is something that far greater minds than mine have been struggling with for decades. One person's "obscene" is after all probably far different from yours or mine. I honestly find the whole thing a bit absurd as free "adult" material is quite literally everywhere on the internet and it is NOT going to go away. That cat is well and truly out of the bag at this point and I honestly feel like the focus should be on giving responsible adults the tools they need to be responsible parents and not on banning or restricting other adults from being... well adults with adult tastes and adult interests.

antares

Well, I don't think it's a moral question. Indeed, there are many legal issues that website owners may have to face, so I repeat what I already wrote to EternaSky: their site, their rules! The important is that these rule are well understood and clearly displayed here on the site.

antares

Of course, but how the censorship algorithm is trained is up to human decision. What's important, in my opinion, is to clearly specify what will be rated as Adult, and that what is rated as Adult cannot be published.

antares

Well, I think the decision is up to the BudgetPixel team: their site, their rules! The important is that these rule are well understood and clearly displayed here on the site.